Comments on: More pano testing… http://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/ Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Thomhttp://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-5012 Thom Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:36:28 +0000 http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=3108#comment-5012 Thanks to all for the response. It makes sense now.. Thanks to all for the response. It makes sense now..

]]> By: Jasonhttp://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-5008 Jason Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:29:37 +0000 http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=3108#comment-5008 Burt's reply below is a pretty good one and what I would have suggested the same. You can increase the size by scrolling in. If you want to see the full size, you would have to decrease the resolution to the point where the monitor can display the entire pano across the screen. Since most monitors are only 1028 or 1280 wide, that means reducing the width to one of those in order to see a full size view without having to scroll left and right. Burt’s reply below is a pretty good one and what I would have suggested the same. You can increase the size by scrolling in. If you want to see the full size, you would have to decrease the resolution to the point where the monitor can display the entire pano across the screen. Since most monitors are only 1028 or 1280 wide, that means reducing the width to one of those in order to see a full size view without having to scroll left and right.

]]> By: Burthttp://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-5007 Burt Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:26:21 +0000 http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=3108#comment-5007 Thom - your problem is that the image is being reduced in size on the screen so that the entire horizontal image can be seen. The result is that the height is reduced to the point of not being usable.That reduction is only the default view though. Zoom in (command +) and you will see tons of detail in the image. My Canon 5D MK II would give me a 7 image pano of 39,000 X 3700 pixels, or 147 MB image. In normal preview, it looks tiny. Zoom in though and it is massively huge.Of course, all that assumes you did not make the pano with the trial version of some programs that restrict the output size. Thom – your problem is that the image is being reduced in size on the screen so that the entire horizontal image can be seen. The result is that the height is reduced to the point of not being usable.

That reduction is only the default view though. Zoom in (command +) and you will see tons of detail in the image. My Canon 5D MK II would give me a 7 image pano of 39,000 X 3700 pixels, or 147 MB image. In normal preview, it looks tiny. Zoom in though and it is massively huge.

Of course, all that assumes you did not make the pano with the trial version of some programs that restrict the output size.

]]> By: MariaVhttp://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-5005 MariaV Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:45:17 +0000 http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=3108#comment-5005 I would also like to know your response to Thom's question. Would having more shots make a difference? I would also like to know your response to Thom’s question. Would having more shots make a difference?

]]> By: Thomhttp://www.canonblogger.com/2010/03/10/more-pano-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-5004 Thom Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:39:04 +0000 http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=3108#comment-5004 JasonI took some pano shots in the fall.. when I got it stiched together (using Adobe Elements 6) it was very small to see. I think my originals were 7 shots horizontally. This is not the 1st time this has happened to me.. what am i doing wrong? Jason

I took some pano shots in the fall.. when I got it stiched together (using Adobe Elements 6) it was very small to see. I think my originals were 7 shots horizontally. This is not the 1st time this has happened to me.. what am i doing wrong?

]]>