<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/</link> <description>Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: GT</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4021</link> <dc:creator>GT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:22:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-4021</guid> <description>FYI,Zoom lenses are lenses that allow the change of focal length. You can have wide zooms such as the 17-55mm, or any other non-prime (fixed focal length) lens.I think that when you said &quot;zoom&quot; in this article you really meant &quot;telephoto&quot;. Please correct the article as not to confuse people who are new to this - because it may lead them in awkward conversations on various forums.Ideally, to make this list complete, you may want to mention what&#039;s the difference between zoom lenses and primes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI,</p><p>Zoom lenses are lenses that allow the change of focal length. You can have wide zooms such as the 17-55mm, or any other non-prime (fixed focal length) lens.</p><p>I think that when you said &#8220;zoom&#8221; in this article you really meant &#8220;telephoto&#8221;. Please correct the article as not to confuse people who are new to this &#8211; because it may lead them in awkward conversations on various forums.</p><p>Ideally, to make this list complete, you may want to mention what&#8217;s the difference between zoom lenses and primes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#8211; Jason Anderson (Canon Blogger) @ Photo News Today</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3860</link> <dc:creator>Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#8211; Jason Anderson (Canon Blogger) @ Photo News Today</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3860</guid> <description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;canonblogger.com [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;canonblogger.com [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Needham</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3859</link> <dc:creator>Matt Needham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:23:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3859</guid> <description>Here is some advice on lenses from H.P. Robinson, an accomplished photographer from the days before film.  Although this was written about 120 years ago it&#039;s amazing how it&#039;s still accurate.  :)&quot;The lens is always considered the most important of all the tools the photographer employs. So it is, but I should like to say boldly that, within limits, I do not care what make of lens I use. It is as well to have the best your means will allow, but there has always been too much made of particular variations in the make of lenses. It has been the fashion to think too much of the tools and too little of the use made of them. I have one friend who did nothing last year because he had made up his mind to buy a new lens, and could not determine whose make it should be, and he was tired of his old apparatus. His was of the order of particular and minute minds that try to whittle nothing to a point. I have another friend who takes delight in preparing for photography, and spends a small fortune in doing so, but never takes a picture.&quot;  -H.P. Robinson</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is some advice on lenses from H.P. Robinson, an accomplished photographer from the days before film.  Although this was written about 120 years ago it&#8217;s amazing how it&#8217;s still accurate. <img
src='http://www.canonblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>&#8220;The lens is always considered the most important of all the tools the photographer employs. So it is, but I should like to say boldly that, within limits, I do not care what make of lens I use. It is as well to have the best your means will allow, but there has always been too much made of particular variations in the make of lenses. It has been the fashion to think too much of the tools and too little of the use made of them. I have one friend who did nothing last year because he had made up his mind to buy a new lens, and could not determine whose make it should be, and he was tired of his old apparatus. His was of the order of particular and minute minds that try to whittle nothing to a point. I have another friend who takes delight in preparing for photography, and spends a small fortune in doing so, but never takes a picture.&#8221;  -H.P. Robinson</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#124; Canon Blogger -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3848</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#124; Canon Blogger -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3848</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Batdorff II and Alltop. Alltop said: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? http://bit.ly/1efjwn Photography.alltop [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Batdorff II and Alltop. Alltop said: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? <a
href="http://bit.ly/1efjwn"  rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1efjwn</a> Photography.alltop [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich C</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3846</link> <dc:creator>Rich C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3846</guid> <description>Good one Jason.  I&#039;ll add a little more to this, as I&#039;ve learned a few fun facts myself.  I run around with 3 standard lenses in my pack.  I own more lenses than that, but my magic 3 really work out.My 17-40mm is great for landscapes (wide angle).  My 24-70mm is also great on landscape work, people shots, portraits, and close range work with fire dancers (it&#039;s a 2.8).  Finally, my 70-200  is multi-purpose.  It&#039;s great for compressing landscapes, and it&#039;s an amazing portrait lens.  Actually, I prefer portrait work with the 70-200mm.One last thought.  People always ask about what camera, what lenses, and how to be a great photographer.  I recently met one of the most amazing portrait photographers who is undiscovered but I&#039;m hoping to help get found.  He shoots with a Rebel XT and a 70-200mm.  That&#039;s his entire gear list, and his portrait work is the best I&#039;ve seen in a long time!  Not just the gear......it&#039;s the person on that shutter!
.-= Rich C´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheAirstreamChroniclesContinued/~3/FYicZyRo9jU/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;White Pocket:  Day three of the adventure&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one Jason.  I&#8217;ll add a little more to this, as I&#8217;ve learned a few fun facts myself.  I run around with 3 standard lenses in my pack.  I own more lenses than that, but my magic 3 really work out.</p><p>My 17-40mm is great for landscapes (wide angle).  My 24-70mm is also great on landscape work, people shots, portraits, and close range work with fire dancers (it&#8217;s a 2.8).  Finally, my 70-200  is multi-purpose.  It&#8217;s great for compressing landscapes, and it&#8217;s an amazing portrait lens.  Actually, I prefer portrait work with the 70-200mm.</p><p>One last thought.  People always ask about what camera, what lenses, and how to be a great photographer.  I recently met one of the most amazing portrait photographers who is undiscovered but I&#8217;m hoping to help get found.  He shoots with a Rebel XT and a 70-200mm.  That&#8217;s his entire gear list, and his portrait work is the best I&#8217;ve seen in a long time!  Not just the gear&#8230;&#8230;it&#8217;s the person on that shutter!<br
/> .-= Rich C´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheAirstreamChroniclesContinued/~3/FYicZyRo9jU/"  rel="nofollow">White Pocket:  Day three of the adventure</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Mullins</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3843</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Mullins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3843</guid> <description>Great summary Jason.  You&#039;ve got a nice overview there.  I think one of the best lenses I ever had in terms of focal coverage was the 18-55.   Great wide angle coverage and great portrait and medium zoom.
.-= Kevin Mullins´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MalmesburyTetburyAndCotswoldPhotography/~3/0P-gHkhOc1Y/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I remember it well….&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary Jason.  You&#8217;ve got a nice overview there.  I think one of the best lenses I ever had in terms of focal coverage was the 18-55.   Great wide angle coverage and great portrait and medium zoom.<br
/> .-= Kevin Mullins´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MalmesburyTetburyAndCotswoldPhotography/~3/0P-gHkhOc1Y/"  rel="nofollow">I remember it well….</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: noneed.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#124; Canon Blogger</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/09/30/classic-questions-on-photography-which-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-3840</link> <dc:creator>noneed.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#124; Canon Blogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:08:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=2246#comment-3840</guid> <description>[...] the rest here: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? &#124; Canon Blogger  October 1st, 2009 in Digital Photography, Gadget News &#124; tags: 2-0-beta, digital-photography, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: Classic Questions on Photography: Which Lens? | Canon Blogger  October 1st, 2009 in Digital Photography, Gadget News | tags: 2-0-beta, digital-photography, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 791/816 objects using apc

Served from: www.canonblogger.com @ 2012-02-12 00:36:11 -->
