<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Photoshop CS3 vs Elements 7.0 &#8211; Part One</title> <atom:link href="http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/</link> <description>Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Jones</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link> <dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:28:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2195</guid> <description>First, great post!My primary image editing tool is LR2 - and I couple that with Elements for some creative processes.  In fact, I&#039;ve been using Elements since version 2.  There have been times when I think CS would have helped with a tweak or action or both - but those have been rare.And I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;ve ever paid more than US$90 for Elements (unless it was coupled with the video editing software) - making it a great bang-for-buck tool.  The money saved is available for glass or other tools.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, great post!</p><p>My primary image editing tool is LR2 &#8211; and I couple that with Elements for some creative processes.  In fact, I&#8217;ve been using Elements since version 2.  There have been times when I think CS would have helped with a tweak or action or both &#8211; but those have been rare.</p><p>And I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;ve ever paid more than US$90 for Elements (unless it was coupled with the video editing software) &#8211; making it a great bang-for-buck tool.  The money saved is available for glass or other tools.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nancy Nally</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link> <dc:creator>Nancy Nally</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2181</guid> <description>I shoot a Canon Rebel XS and I use a combination of Lightroom 2 and PSE 6 on my Mac for my photo editing. I find that together they do 99% of what I need or want to do for my personal and professional editing (I use my photos for the website that I run), but at a fraction of the price of CS3. It&#039;s just really hard to justify that additional expense - I think I&#039;d rather spend that money on equipment than on the software. I think I get more use out of the money spent that way.My husband used to use CS3 professionally working in graphics and having only PSE at home now  frustrates him no end because he is used to doing what he wants to a file in a different way, and non-destructively. It&#039;s a bit of a different thought process at times, and requires re-thinking things a bit. Most things can still be achieved in PSE but it occasionally takes a little more work and sometimes can&#039;t be done non-destructively so you have to make sure you are working on a copy. Given the savings, I&#039;d say that the few times I have to do things &quot;the hard way&quot; are worth it.Kelby&#039;s book on PSE for Digital Photographers helped me a ton, actually, and is worth picking up to help make the transition between CS3 and PSE probably.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot a Canon Rebel XS and I use a combination of Lightroom 2 and PSE 6 on my Mac for my photo editing. I find that together they do 99% of what I need or want to do for my personal and professional editing (I use my photos for the website that I run), but at a fraction of the price of CS3. It&#8217;s just really hard to justify that additional expense &#8211; I think I&#8217;d rather spend that money on equipment than on the software. I think I get more use out of the money spent that way.</p><p>My husband used to use CS3 professionally working in graphics and having only PSE at home now  frustrates him no end because he is used to doing what he wants to a file in a different way, and non-destructively. It&#8217;s a bit of a different thought process at times, and requires re-thinking things a bit. Most things can still be achieved in PSE but it occasionally takes a little more work and sometimes can&#8217;t be done non-destructively so you have to make sure you are working on a copy. Given the savings, I&#8217;d say that the few times I have to do things &#8220;the hard way&#8221; are worth it.</p><p>Kelby&#8217;s book on PSE for Digital Photographers helped me a ton, actually, and is worth picking up to help make the transition between CS3 and PSE probably.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: REVIEW: Photoshop CS3 vs Elements 7.0 - Part One - Canon Blogger &#171; Out of the Dark Room</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2143</link> <dc:creator>REVIEW: Photoshop CS3 vs Elements 7.0 - Part One - Canon Blogger &#171; Out of the Dark Room</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:58:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2143</guid> <description>[...] Read the entire review at: Canon Blogger [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the entire review at: Canon Blogger [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: //REVIEW// Photoshop CS3 vs Elements 7.0 - Part One - Canon Blogger &#124; Photo News Today</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link> <dc:creator>//REVIEW// Photoshop CS3 vs Elements 7.0 - Part One - Canon Blogger &#124; Photo News Today</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2142</guid> <description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;canonblogger.com [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;canonblogger.com [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Palmer</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2139</link> <dc:creator>Mike Palmer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:19:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2139</guid> <description>Nice post!!  I had never used elements, makes me want to give it a whirl!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post!!  I had never used elements, makes me want to give it a whirl!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Solley</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link> <dc:creator>Tim Solley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:11:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2137</guid> <description>I&#039;m also in the &quot;use LR almost exclusively&quot; camp.  About the only thing I go into PS for is better sharpening (they GOTTA improve that in LR) and third party plugins.  I&#039;m curious how compatible third party tools are with Elements.  For example, do Nik Software&#039;s plugins work with it?  Dunno.  I&#039;d be curious what you find out in round 2.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also in the &#8220;use LR almost exclusively&#8221; camp.  About the only thing I go into PS for is better sharpening (they GOTTA improve that in LR) and third party plugins.  I&#8217;m curious how compatible third party tools are with Elements.  For example, do Nik Software&#8217;s plugins work with it?  Dunno.  I&#8217;d be curious what you find out in round 2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sunny</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2135</link> <dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2135</guid> <description>I had always been an Elements user...currently have Elements 6...UNTIL I got Lightroom 2.  Now, I rarely go into Elements, and then it&#039;s for something like cloning, applying a texture, etc.  I see Lightroom being the software of choice before too long.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had always been an Elements user&#8230;currently have Elements 6&#8230;UNTIL I got Lightroom 2.  Now, I rarely go into Elements, and then it&#8217;s for something like cloning, applying a texture, etc.  I see Lightroom being the software of choice before too long.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CharkR</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2133</link> <dc:creator>CharkR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:05:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2133</guid> <description>I&#039;ve actually used Elements and Photoshop both fairly regularly, Photoshop more so than Elements. I had been in the same boat about cost. Upgrading and or constantly purchasing Photoshop over buying the more inexpensive Elements. Elements came with my tablet and I tried it. I have to say that one of the biggest things that I love about Photoshop is the non-destructive ability to use masks and create smart objects, and going back to editing filters if you want to make adjustments.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually used Elements and Photoshop both fairly regularly, Photoshop more so than Elements. I had been in the same boat about cost. Upgrading and or constantly purchasing Photoshop over buying the more inexpensive Elements. Elements came with my tablet and I tried it. I have to say that one of the biggest things that I love about Photoshop is the non-destructive ability to use masks and create smart objects, and going back to editing filters if you want to make adjustments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: shaznyc</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2132</link> <dc:creator>shaznyc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:24:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2132</guid> <description>Love to see the comparisons lay out like this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love to see the comparisons lay out like this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Mullins</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/19/photoshop-cs3-vs-elements-70-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Mullins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:23:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1518#comment-2131</guid> <description>If it were possible, I&#039;d love to see Adobe combine all the phot editing tools of Elements, PS and LR into one application (LR probably), and leave Photoshop to the design technologies.  I reckon that&#039;s the way it will go in the future.  More and more stuff is being taken from PS/Elements and put into LR so I&#039;m cautiously optomistic, thatn, two or three versions of LR from now, we, as photographers, will have no need for Photoshop or Elements...... I hope.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were possible, I&#8217;d love to see Adobe combine all the phot editing tools of Elements, PS and LR into one application (LR probably), and leave Photoshop to the design technologies.  I reckon that&#8217;s the way it will go in the future.  More and more stuff is being taken from PS/Elements and put into LR so I&#8217;m cautiously optomistic, thatn, two or three versions of LR from now, we, as photographers, will have no need for Photoshop or Elements&#8230;&#8230; I hope.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 865/899 objects using apc

Served from: www.canonblogger.com @ 2012-02-12 00:19:03 -->
