<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 70-200L f4.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/</link>
	<description>Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been shooting this lens for near 4 years.  It&#039;s my &quot;go to&quot; lens for sports and general out-n-about excursions.  It&#039;s incredibly sharp at f/4 - and focuses quickly in fast action (ultimate frisbee, rugby, frisbee chasing dogs, ...).

As far as L glass goes - this lens hits a sweet spot in price vs. performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been shooting this lens for near 4 years.  It&#8217;s my &#8220;go to&#8221; lens for sports and general out-n-about excursions.  It&#8217;s incredibly sharp at f/4 &#8211; and focuses quickly in fast action (ultimate frisbee, rugby, frisbee chasing dogs, &#8230;).</p>
<p>As far as L glass goes &#8211; this lens hits a sweet spot in price vs. performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Solley</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Solley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually just jumped into this pond.  As I write this, I&#039;m waiting for UPS to deliver my 70-200 f/2.8 IS.  Pricey I know, but I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll be happy with it.  I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll be out this evening testing it out :-)  I&#039;m starting to do weddings, and with an extra 4 stops (aperture and IS), I thought it was worth the upgrade.  Time will tell on that.

Once I&#039;ve had a chance to play with it, I&#039;ll put a review on Sublime Light, and I&#039;ll be sure to send people your way to see a comparison with the f/4 non IS.

Cheers Jason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually just jumped into this pond.  As I write this, I&#8217;m waiting for UPS to deliver my 70-200 f/2.8 IS.  Pricey I know, but I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll be happy with it.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll be out this evening testing it out <img src='http://www.canonblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;m starting to do weddings, and with an extra 4 stops (aperture and IS), I thought it was worth the upgrade.  Time will tell on that.</p>
<p>Once I&#8217;ve had a chance to play with it, I&#8217;ll put a review on Sublime Light, and I&#8217;ll be sure to send people your way to see a comparison with the f/4 non IS.</p>
<p>Cheers Jason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got this lens too and it&#039;s great.  The weight makes a real option for most shooting situations and as you say Jason - it&#039;s tack sharp pretty much across the range.  These personal reviews are excellent by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got this lens too and it&#8217;s great.  The weight makes a real option for most shooting situations and as you say Jason &#8211; it&#8217;s tack sharp pretty much across the range.  These personal reviews are excellent by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinesh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>This is an awesome lens. I recently got this from BHphotovideo for $560 with 40$ canon rebate and the very next day it became $600! Quite lucky and loving the lens. Yes, it is a bit heavy feel for Rebel Xsi and I may look out for a 3rd party collar to mount on tripod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an awesome lens. I recently got this from BHphotovideo for $560 with 40$ canon rebate and the very next day it became $600! Quite lucky and loving the lens. Yes, it is a bit heavy feel for Rebel Xsi and I may look out for a 3rd party collar to mount on tripod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: //REVIEW// The 70-200L f4.0 - Canon Blogger &#124; Photo News Today</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>//REVIEW// The 70-200L f4.0 - Canon Blogger &#124; Photo News Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;canonblogger.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;canonblogger.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Witham</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Witham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>I would say my 70-200L f/4 is my most used lens, I had the previous non-IS version as well. Easily my favorite lens in the bag, stunningly sharp and with IS gives me more chances to use it that before. If I did not have to worry about the $ I would get the 2.8 and be very happy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say my 70-200L f/4 is my most used lens, I had the previous non-IS version as well. Easily my favorite lens in the bag, stunningly sharp and with IS gives me more chances to use it that before. If I did not have to worry about the $ I would get the 2.8 and be very happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2009/05/18/the-70-200l-f40/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=1502#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>I have had all of the 70-200L lenses and kept the f4IS. It is the sharpest of them all and its light weight make it perfect to carry it everywhere. Anyone who buy the standard 70-200f4 is going to want to move to the IS eventually and since this is such a popular lens, I highly recommend going straight for the IS version. 

IS is always useful, with this lens I am able to shoot at 1/30 sec and get a sharp picture 50% of the time. Truly an amazing lens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had all of the 70-200L lenses and kept the f4IS. It is the sharpest of them all and its light weight make it perfect to carry it everywhere. Anyone who buy the standard 70-200f4 is going to want to move to the IS eventually and since this is such a popular lens, I highly recommend going straight for the IS version. </p>
<p>IS is always useful, with this lens I am able to shoot at 1/30 sec and get a sharp picture 50% of the time. Truly an amazing lens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
