<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Beauty of Bokeh</title> <atom:link href="http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/07/07/the-beauty-of-bokeh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/07/07/the-beauty-of-bokeh/</link> <description>Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/07/07/the-beauty-of-bokeh/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=346#comment-884</guid> <description>I had a &quot;nifty fifty&quot; when I frst got started with digital and didn&#039;t realize what I had - I think the &quot;loud&quot; factor in its focusing mechanism threw me off.  Now I wish I had it back - whither that we knowest now what we should have known then, eh? :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a &#8220;nifty fifty&#8221; when I frst got started with digital and didn&#8217;t realize what I had &#8211; I think the &#8220;loud&#8221; factor in its focusing mechanism threw me off.  Now I wish I had it back &#8211; whither that we knowest now what we should have known then, eh? <img
src='http://www.canonblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Solley</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/07/07/the-beauty-of-bokeh/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link> <dc:creator>Tim Solley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:19:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/?p=346#comment-883</guid> <description>Yes, it&#039;s true that bokeh quality is a big factor in the quality of photographs.I have a Canon 50mm f/1.8 &quot;nifty fifty&quot; lens.  It&#039;s my cheapest lens at something like $70 and has (not surprisingly) only 5 blades.  This gives a rougher bokeh.  Certainly nothing as smooth as an expensive &quot;L&quot; lens.Funny thing though.  I think it&#039;s my favorite lens in my bag.  Granted, I don&#039;t have any &quot;L&quot; glass.  There&#039;s something about the quality of photo from that lens that seems to overrule the less than amazing bokeh.  And I&#039;m a bokeh junkeh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true that bokeh quality is a big factor in the quality of photographs.</p><p>I have a Canon 50mm f/1.8 &#8220;nifty fifty&#8221; lens.  It&#8217;s my cheapest lens at something like $70 and has (not surprisingly) only 5 blades.  This gives a rougher bokeh.  Certainly nothing as smooth as an expensive &#8220;L&#8221; lens.</p><p>Funny thing though.  I think it&#8217;s my favorite lens in my bag.  Granted, I don&#8217;t have any &#8220;L&#8221; glass.  There&#8217;s something about the quality of photo from that lens that seems to overrule the less than amazing bokeh.  And I&#8217;m a bokeh junkeh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 661/671 objects using apc

Served from: www.canonblogger.com @ 2012-02-11 18:45:42 -->
