<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Canon ST-E2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/</link> <description>Home of the Learning Digital Photography Podcast with Jason Anderson</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/#comment-487</guid> <description>Thanks for the post Brian - I hadn&#039;t thought of the minimal output required for the ST-E2, that does kind of mitigate the ned to consider rechargeables given the cost and, as you said, does probably explain why the R&amp;D has never gone into making a NiMH version of it.As for the radio vs. infrared, good catch...I was noticing the limited range outside and had thought &quot;too bad it&#039;s not RF&quot;, and for some reason that stuck in my head when writing the post.  I&#039;ll make an update later tonight.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Brian &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t thought of the minimal output required for the ST-E2, that does kind of mitigate the ned to consider rechargeables given the cost and, as you said, does probably explain why the R&#038;D has never gone into making a NiMH version of it.</p><p>As for the radio vs. infrared, good catch&#8230;I was noticing the limited range outside and had thought &#8220;too bad it&#8217;s not RF&#8221;, and for some reason that stuck in my head when writing the post.  I&#8217;ll make an update later tonight.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Reyman</title><link>http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link> <dc:creator>Brian Reyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonblogger.com/2008/03/14/the-canon-st-e2/#comment-486</guid> <description>First of all, thanks for a great blog. I really enjoy reading your posts.Second, interesting thoughts on the battery. I own an ST-E2 and have the non-rechargable lithium version of the 2CR5. I doubt it comes in a rechargable NIMH, simply due to demand (there isn&#039;t as much for these as say, AAs). I suppose I could be wrong there, though.In my opinion, it&#039;s a moot point. The lithium works plenty well. The ST-E2 doesn&#039;t require much juice and the battery lasts a LONG time in it - for thousands and thousands of shots. I&#039;ve had mine for 6+ months and haven&#039;t changed it yet. I&#039;d say you could have a primary in the unit, one backup battery in your bag and probably call it good. That would help avoid the recharging issue altogether.Also, as a small note to your original post, the ST-E2 isn&#039;t radio-based, it is infrared. Radio transmitters, like PocketWizards allow much further distances and don&#039;t require line of sight. The ST-E2, though, has a somewhat limited range (especially outdoors) and needs either a line of sight, or a room where the infrared pulses can bounce around and make their way to the flash. That being said, I LOVE my unit - it works very well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, thanks for a great blog. I really enjoy reading your posts.</p><p>Second, interesting thoughts on the battery. I own an ST-E2 and have the non-rechargable lithium version of the 2CR5. I doubt it comes in a rechargable NIMH, simply due to demand (there isn&#8217;t as much for these as say, AAs). I suppose I could be wrong there, though.</p><p>In my opinion, it&#8217;s a moot point. The lithium works plenty well. The ST-E2 doesn&#8217;t require much juice and the battery lasts a LONG time in it &#8211; for thousands and thousands of shots. I&#8217;ve had mine for 6+ months and haven&#8217;t changed it yet. I&#8217;d say you could have a primary in the unit, one backup battery in your bag and probably call it good. That would help avoid the recharging issue altogether.</p><p>Also, as a small note to your original post, the ST-E2 isn&#8217;t radio-based, it is infrared. Radio transmitters, like PocketWizards allow much further distances and don&#8217;t require line of sight. The ST-E2, though, has a somewhat limited range (especially outdoors) and needs either a line of sight, or a room where the infrared pulses can bounce around and make their way to the flash. That being said, I LOVE my unit &#8211; it works very well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 657/667 objects using apc

Served from: www.canonblogger.com @ 2012-02-11 21:12:58 -->
